Purple Watkins Trial Mark bottle

Welcome to our Antique Bottle community

Be a part of something great, join today!

snmashar

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I have an embossed Watkins Trial Mark bottle that is purple. It has seams running through the top, a double collar at the top, and a trademark on the bottom that is an I in a diamond. The I/diamond mark is inside a larger circle with rather rough edges...sort of pleated along the edges and distorted...with no additional dating numbers/letters. It is the 8.25" tall, 3" wide, 1.75" thick flask or rectangular bottle. There is no paper label or other markings on the bottle.

From the research I've done online, the trademark is for Illinois Glass and the bottle was probably made on an Owens bottle making machine. I've seen various dates for the I/diamond mark that say it was used in the 20's, but one site said it was used from 1915 to 1929. The bottle is a deep purple, not a light purple, and there is some iridescense on the inside which I think must be from being buried. I thought the bottle was probably an old "manganese" glass bottle that turned purple from extended sun exposure. However, I've read online that manganese was used as a decolorizing agent in glass only until about 1915. In other words, unless the I/Diamond mark really WAS used as early (or earlier) as 1915 it is unlikely that it would appear on a sun colored purple bottle.

I bought the bottle...simply for its deep purple color...at a 2nd hand store. They said it was not an old bottle, "probably only about 40 or 50 years old". It was only $2. I have been unable to find ANY reference to a PURPLE Watkins bottle anywhere online. I have read...repeatedly...that Watkins bottles are common and not worth anything, and also that old manganese glass is sometimes irradiated to make it turn darker purple or turn purple more quickly and that this ALSO devalues sun 'purpled' glass.

I haven't found any mention of modern purple Watkins bottles (I know they still use a Trial Mark bottle), or of reproduction Watkins bottles...particularly purple ones. But the implication is also that it would be unusual to have the I/Diamond trademark on a bottle made of glass that was decolorized with manganese. I don't CARE if it is valuable or rare, I'd just like to know that it is "old". 1915 or even 1920something is old, to ME. Can anyone help date this bottle, or give me better information on the when they stopped using manganese in glass to decolorize it, or if there if there were utilitarian bottles, like Watkins bottles, that were purposely colored purple (not sun colored) and when those were made. Thanks very much.
 

appliedlips

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
14
Points
38
Without a picture it is hard to be sure, but I'd guess it is a 20's or later bottle that has been artificially irradiated. Although manganese was used regularly before 1915 it was also used later and can be naturally occurring in the ingredients in the glass. Some bottle much later than 1915 can sometimes turn purple through irradiation. Value would be minimal whether it was in its original state or altered. It is an old bottle,however and not modern.
 

cowseatmaize

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Messages
12,387
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Northeastern USA
Welcome!
This is from Cecil Munsey's An Illustrated Guide to Collecting Bottles.
"From around 1880, when the demand for clear glass... until approximately 1915, at which time World War I cut off the main source--Germany--manganese was America's most widely used decolorizing agent. By 1916 glassmakers were using the more stable but also more expensive decolorizing agent, selenium.".
Illinois Glass is thought to have gone to machine process around 1910. Your description is wonderful. I would think that it's right in between 1910 and 1916.
 

RED Matthews

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,898
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Location
Sarasota FL & Burdett NY
Hello snmashar; Welcome to the FORUM. This subject of (SCA) Sun Colored Amethyst and irradiated glass
is something that is really disturbing. I have a bottle that was irradiated and the only thing I can recognize as a difference, is the fact that the older glass has other inclusions of dirt and bubbles, while the irradiated glass is newer and usually batch house loaded cleaner glass quality.
Thanks for starting the thread - the subject is of interest to me. RED Matthews
 

snmashar

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Here are a couple of photos of my purple Watkins Trial Mark bottle. My only editor option that compressed them to below 200kb goes WAY below. This is the first time I've tried compressing and posting photos online. I hope they show are adequate. I thank everyone who has responded so far. OK, I see it will only let me load one photo, so that's all there is!

CA78CEC438BA4CD2965DF7505588E0BC.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CA78CEC438BA4CD2965DF7505588E0BC.jpg
    CA78CEC438BA4CD2965DF7505588E0BC.jpg
    46.6 KB · Views: 109

snmashar

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Here's the a shot of the whole bottle. I can see bubbles in the glass...not too many, but some very small round and elongated bubbles. But nothing like dirt or other inclusions. I'll try to take a photo of the base tomorrow.

2BC773A4D9DD420E822172BA2EDA65BA.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2BC773A4D9DD420E822172BA2EDA65BA.jpg
    2BC773A4D9DD420E822172BA2EDA65BA.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 115

coboltmoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
573
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Can we possibly get a picture of the mark. Owens Illinois mark was first used in 1929 (some say 1928).

In the pic is an OI mark

9AFF5B6F8048498E8AC2F00288B83FF0.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 9AFF5B6F8048498E8AC2F00288B83FF0.jpg
    9AFF5B6F8048498E8AC2F00288B83FF0.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 97

snmashar

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
The marks on my bottle are rather "flat" and indistinct. Here is the best shot I got of the I in a diamond mark from the bottom. This also shows the round mark that is, supposedly NOT a pontil mark, but from some suction thing on the Owens machine. There is also a 6 on the bottom, back, lower edge. I'll post that photo, too.

607483618DA845A7B080513F11BD8C71.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 607483618DA845A7B080513F11BD8C71.jpg
    607483618DA845A7B080513F11BD8C71.jpg
    67.7 KB · Views: 91

snmashar

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Here is that mark from anothe angle. In this one you can see that it's not crackle on the bottom, it is more like pleated/wrinkled glass.

E9407DA3189C4B609668B765BA09F986.jpg
 

Attachments

  • E9407DA3189C4B609668B765BA09F986.jpg
    E9407DA3189C4B609668B765BA09F986.jpg
    70.8 KB · Views: 92

Latest posts

Members online

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Threads
83,979
Messages
747,249
Members
25,058
Latest member
MBC
Top